The Clinical Representativeness of Couple Therapy Outcome Research
Identifieur interne : 000662 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000661; suivant : 000663The Clinical Representativeness of Couple Therapy Outcome Research
Auteurs : John Wright [Canada] ; Stéphane Sabourin [Canada] ; Josianne Mondor [Canada] ; Pierre Mcduff [Canada] ; Salima Mamodhoussen [Canada]Source :
- Family Process [ 0014-7370 ] ; 2007-09.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
The clinical representativeness of outcome studies is defined as the generalizability of recruitment processes, assessment/diagnostic procedures, treatment protocols, and therapeutic results from research settings to naturalistic treatment settings. The main goal of the present study was to examine the clinical representativeness of couple therapy in outcome studies. The data set was formed by 50 published clinical trials, including 34 couple therapy outcome studies for marital distress (CTMD) and 16 couple therapy outcome studies for comorbid relational and mental disorders (CTMD+C). The present findings showed that, overall, the clinical representativeness of couple therapy outcome studies is only fair (i.e., the mean global score is slightly lower than the midpoint of the rating scale used to assess representativeness). CTMD+C studies fared better than CTMD studies on many dimensions of clinical relevance. Studies in which pretherapy training was less intensive (for CTMD studies only), treatment was less structured, and therapists were more experienced showed larger effect sizes than those in which such was not the case.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2007.00213.x
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 000424
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 000424
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000414
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 000663
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 000662
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The Clinical Representativeness of Couple Therapy Outcome Research</title><author><name sortKey="Wright, John" sort="Wright, John" uniqKey="Wright J" first="John" last="Wright">John Wright</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sabourin, Stephane" sort="Sabourin, Stephane" uniqKey="Sabourin S" first="Stéphane" last="Sabourin">Stéphane Sabourin</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mondor, Josianne" sort="Mondor, Josianne" uniqKey="Mondor J" first="Josianne" last="Mondor">Josianne Mondor</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mcduff, Pierre" sort="Mcduff, Pierre" uniqKey="Mcduff P" first="Pierre" last="Mcduff">Pierre Mcduff</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mamodhoussen, Salima" sort="Mamodhoussen, Salima" uniqKey="Mamodhoussen S" first="Salima" last="Mamodhoussen">Salima Mamodhoussen</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:CE2B98CFDD251BC632DE679D2A46BE2C3BF6E6AF</idno><date when="2007" year="2007">2007</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1545-5300.2007.00213.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/CE2B98CFDD251BC632DE679D2A46BE2C3BF6E6AF/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000424</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000424</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000424</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000414</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000414</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0014-7370:2007:Wright J:the:clinical:representativeness</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000663</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000662</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000662</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The Clinical Representativeness of Couple Therapy Outcome Research</title><author><name sortKey="Wright, John" sort="Wright, John" uniqKey="Wright J" first="John" last="Wright">John Wright</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>Département de psychologie, Université de Montréal [Department of Psychology, University of Montreal], Québec</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Québec</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sabourin, Stephane" sort="Sabourin, Stephane" uniqKey="Sabourin S" first="Stéphane" last="Sabourin">Stéphane Sabourin</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>École de psychologie, Université Laval [School of Psychology, Laval University], Québec</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Québec</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mondor, Josianne" sort="Mondor, Josianne" uniqKey="Mondor J" first="Josianne" last="Mondor">Josianne Mondor</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>Département de psychologie, Université de Montréal [Department of Psychology, University of Montreal], Québec</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Québec</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mcduff, Pierre" sort="Mcduff, Pierre" uniqKey="Mcduff P" first="Pierre" last="Mcduff">Pierre Mcduff</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>Département de psychologie, Université de Montréal [Department of Psychology, University of Montreal], Québec</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Québec</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mamodhoussen, Salima" sort="Mamodhoussen, Salima" uniqKey="Mamodhoussen S" first="Salima" last="Mamodhoussen">Salima Mamodhoussen</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>École de psychologie, Université Laval [School of Psychology, Laval University], Québec</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Québec</wicri:noRegion></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>Medical Clinic, National Defence, Montréal Garison, Montréal, Québec</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Québec</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Family Process</title><idno type="ISSN">0014-7370</idno><idno type="eISSN">1545-5300</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-09">2007-09</date><biblScope unit="volume">46</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="301">301</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="316">316</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0014-7370</idno></series><idno type="istex">CE2B98CFDD251BC632DE679D2A46BE2C3BF6E6AF</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1545-5300.2007.00213.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">FAMP213</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0014-7370</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Clinical Representativeness</term><term>Couple Therapy</term><term>Effect Size</term><term>Marriage Counseling</term><term>Treatment Effectiveness</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The clinical representativeness of outcome studies is defined as the generalizability of recruitment processes, assessment/diagnostic procedures, treatment protocols, and therapeutic results from research settings to naturalistic treatment settings. The main goal of the present study was to examine the clinical representativeness of couple therapy in outcome studies. The data set was formed by 50 published clinical trials, including 34 couple therapy outcome studies for marital distress (CTMD) and 16 couple therapy outcome studies for comorbid relational and mental disorders (CTMD+C). The present findings showed that, overall, the clinical representativeness of couple therapy outcome studies is only fair (i.e., the mean global score is slightly lower than the midpoint of the rating scale used to assess representativeness). CTMD+C studies fared better than CTMD studies on many dimensions of clinical relevance. Studies in which pretherapy training was less intensive (for CTMD studies only), treatment was less structured, and therapists were more experienced showed larger effect sizes than those in which such was not the case.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Canada</li></country></list><tree><country name="Canada"><noRegion><name sortKey="Wright, John" sort="Wright, John" uniqKey="Wright J" first="John" last="Wright">John Wright</name></noRegion><name sortKey="Mamodhoussen, Salima" sort="Mamodhoussen, Salima" uniqKey="Mamodhoussen S" first="Salima" last="Mamodhoussen">Salima Mamodhoussen</name><name sortKey="Mamodhoussen, Salima" sort="Mamodhoussen, Salima" uniqKey="Mamodhoussen S" first="Salima" last="Mamodhoussen">Salima Mamodhoussen</name><name sortKey="Mcduff, Pierre" sort="Mcduff, Pierre" uniqKey="Mcduff P" first="Pierre" last="Mcduff">Pierre Mcduff</name><name sortKey="Mondor, Josianne" sort="Mondor, Josianne" uniqKey="Mondor J" first="Josianne" last="Mondor">Josianne Mondor</name><name sortKey="Sabourin, Stephane" sort="Sabourin, Stephane" uniqKey="Sabourin S" first="Stéphane" last="Sabourin">Stéphane Sabourin</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Psychologie/explor/TherFamFrancoV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000662 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000662 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Psychologie
|area= TherFamFrancoV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:CE2B98CFDD251BC632DE679D2A46BE2C3BF6E6AF
|texte= The Clinical Representativeness of Couple Therapy Outcome Research
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.29. |  |